The Future Shape of Things

admin

The Future Shape of Things Sebastian Friebel Former parliamentary adviser to the German Bundestag Dear fellow citizens , I am addressing you as a non-partisan former employee of the German Bundestag with the function of a parliamentary adviser.As a result of my work in parliament and in a parliamentary group, I have become aware that…

The Future Shape of Things
Sebastian Friebel
Former parliamentary adviser to the German Bundestag
Dear fellow citizens ,
I am addressing you as a non-partisan former employee of the German Bundestag with the function of a parliamentary adviser.As a result of my work in parliament and in a parliamentary group, I have become aware that the people in our country are being deliberately deprived of information on the corona crisis which is of crucial importance for assessing the situation.In view of the enormous significance of recent events, I consider it my duty to my fellow citizens to raise these issues publicly.So as to be able to express myself as freely as possible on these issues, I have resigned from my position in the Bundestag.
I suppose many will lay this text aside after just a few lines because they feel sufficiently informed about all aspects of the crisis.I understand this, because I too used to assumed that, when major events occur, we citizens would always be apprised of the background facts.But in the meantime, not least because of my experiences in parliament, I have been obliged to recognise the methods used worldwide by governments, the media and major players in the global economy to the detriment of us all, and to see that often the population is regrettably too uncritical in its response.I hope that despite this widespread lack of concern about political developments, some of you will at least check out the information provided here.
Some of what I report in the following will be considered by many readers as impossible and will be firmly rejected.I would like to say to these people that in publishing this report I am taking on considerable personal risk, and I would not dare to take this step if I were unsure of my statements.

I do not want to say much about myself at this point.You, dear reader, only need to know the following about me: I am writing this report in sincere concern for the security, freedom and prosperity of us all.These fundamental pillars of our democracy are acutely endangered because the Corona crisis is being instrumentalised, and our legitimate concerns about the virus being exploited for third-party objectives.
I must stress at this point that I do not consider the health risks associated with the virus as trivial.Corona can pose a serious risk, particularly for the elderly and those who are already ill.

This fact is undisputed.But the crisis must not blind us to other serious developments that directly affect us all and about which at the same time we know very little.
It is important that we, as a society, should again become capable of exchanging information without prejudice and with good will, even on controversial issues.We in Germany urgently need to learn once more how to listen to and respect each other.If we do not find our way back to this kind of coexistence our society will finally splinter into hostile groups.

Unfortunately, responses to the Corona crisis have already contributed to further widening the social divide.But as a result, we as citizens lose sight of our common interests and play into the hands of those who see every crisis first and foremost in the light of a business model.
Politicians and the main stream media are currently trying to distract our attention from the serious political and economic changes that are being implemented in connection with the pandemic, having shown up, in this time of Corona, right on cue.

One of their aims to ensure that people, in their fear of the virus, accept measures and permanent restrictions which, given the situation, are in no way justified by the need to maintain social order and are threatening the economic existence of millions of people.
With this report I would like to give my fellow citizens a helping hand so they can deal with publicly accessible sources, and themselves form a picture of these circumstances and of the true extent of the Corona crisis.I cordially invite you to scrutinise my remarks, before the possibility is permanently taken away by the widespread censorship to which we are increasingly subject.
I.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) …as the mouthpiece of the most influential international corporates and major banks, is using the crisis as an instrument to push forward a long-prepared agenda for the world economy.

1 This ‘Great Reset’ is presented as a change at global level towards a sustainable economy, but this is a deception.Actually the companies of the WEF, which is mainly controlled by the financial and digital industries, want a centralisation of political power in supranational institutions such as the United Nations, the EU and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).2 They justify this shift of power on the pretext of managing international crises for the welfare of the population.

3 But is it realistic to think that the largest corporations in the world are suddenly so concerned with the well-being of the individual? Or are they exploiting the goodwill of people who want a fair and peaceful world, and see supranational organisations as possibly being the key to this?
Former UN leaders warn against abuse of the United Nations
Former UN leaders warn that strengthening these organisations under the current influence of the large corporations enables the latter to undermine democratic control of the global economy and the political power of elected parliaments.4 In this way the resistance of individual states to the privatisation orgies of financial speculators can be circumvented, which would greatly benefit their economic interests.So these companies are using the crisis in order to expand their own possibilities of influence.In addition, they want to force out the middle classes permanently and take over the market shares released as a result.

For all these objectives, Corona and the the global economic crisis associated with it hand them everything on a plate.The forces behind the WEF are therefore using their political influence in order to prolong the crisis artificially and bring about the restructuring of the world economy in accordance with their own agenda.

This may sound abstract and suggestive of conspiracy theory, but the announcement of the ‘Great Reset’, right at the height of the Corona crisis, speaks volumes in this regard.
To avoid adverse reactions by the population, and especially the middle classes, to these alarming developments, they wrap the plan in a heart-warming story of a humane, ecological globalisation, and hide their real aim of a shift in power behind attractive-sounding clichés like ‘global governance’ or ‘public-private partnership’.But how credible is it, when precisely those forces which have been unleashed for decades by unprecedented overexploitation of nature at the expense of the general public, suddenly present themselves in a green guise? The fact that the United Nations too promotes this worldwide campaign by the banking sector and large corporations, be it said in passing, only points to the already mentioned misuse of the UN for private sector interests.

5 It is to be feared that political functionaries worldwide will soon demand that the UN, WHO etc.be given more authority – ‘only’ because of Corona and other crises, of course.But in the end, who would really reap the benefit?
Global economic crisis favours transformation of the world economy
Many citizens see the economic crisis that has arisen as a result of the Corona measures as proof that governments put public health above the interests of business.

Unfortunately, precisely the opposite is true: the crisis plays right into the hands of the world’s most influential corporations with their aspired-to transformation of the world economy, very much at the expense of small to medium-sized enterprises.The transfer of political power to higher levels further favours this development.Recently, Bundestag President Schäuble even spoke about this himself with astonishing openness, when he said:
The corona crisis is a great opportunity.In the crisis, resistance to change is diminished.We can now bring about the economic and financial union that we have so far failed to achieve by political means […]’ 6
It was certainly not his intention, but Schäuble himself illustrates, with this statement, why the crisis is very convenient for the long planned transformation.

The centralisation of the economy towards a small number of large corporations and financial investors will be further accelerated by economic union.The most senior political functionaries are aware of these interactions.

Some remain silent because they benefit financially or career-wise from these developments.The others keep silent because they know that if they utter just one honest word, the assembled forces of the media and politics will turn on them and put an abrupt end to their political careers.

Only a few give even an indication of who this crisis really benefits.
Supranational institutions enable corporations to exert an undemocratic influence.If not enough people recognise in time the dangers of a further concentration of power in the hands of a few large institutions and resist this, then we could soon find ourselves in a world in which our democratically legitimised governments have virtually no power of decision any more.This has long been the case in fiscal policy, which is why redistribution from the hard-working to the rich is likewise proceeding unchecked.In addition, ‘because of Corona’ they now also want to transfer the economic policies of all EU member states to the European Union.

However, one should have no illusions as to who will benefit from an increase in the powers of the EU Commission: economic policy at EU level would only serve the interests of transnational companies such as Amazon, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs etc.– an unprecedented privatisation and deregulation would be the consequence.The EU’s attitude is already evident, for example, in the de facto tax exemption enjoyed by digital groups and its privileged treatment of the financial sector.Sahra Wagenknecht describes this relationship as follows:
If more and more competences are now being shifted to a level where the economy, and above all the big companies are much more influential than any other interest group, it is clear what happens: democracy is undermined even more, profit interests become even more shamelessly predominant.It is a complete illusion to believe that a European government would stand up to big business better than national governments.The truth is that because of the balance of power on the EU level, the exact opposite is the case: the more Brussels decides, the easier it is for the mega-corporations to assert their interests.7
Medium-sized businesses and agriculture are bought up, jobs are cut
In parallel to the desired shift in power, governments are ensuring through the Corona measures that large numbers of medium-sized companies can be bought up by large mega-corporations and financial investors.Similar worrying developments have been seen for some years in agriculture.

At the same time, Corona is being used as a pretext for widespread job cuts, which is a basic prerequisite for the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’, i.e.the digital transformation of the economy.This approach is in line with the ‘Great Reset’ agenda and I am afraid has very little to do with the welfare of the population.I therefore appeal in particular to all small and medium-sized enterprises to resist these efforts.For most workers, too, these vigorously pursued plans pose an existential threat because a fully digitised, fully centralised world economy will be able to manage with a much smaller workforce.The road of digitisation thus leads directly towards a conditional (not unconditional) basic income which would entail total dependence.Or, as Siemens Managing Director Joe Kaeser expressed it:
Digitisation will displace the middle class […] And of ten people affected, only one will rise in the world, nine will go down.

And I guarantee you: if there is one thing, that will stop the digital movement, then it will be social unrest.8
So should we uncritically go along with the narrative of digitalisation as salvation, built up by the media and the politicians in the corona crisis? Or is something being forced on us here, whereby in the end the disadvantages to us all will predominate?
II.

Digital companies and governments worldwide …are instrumentalising the fear of the virus to achieve social acceptance for comprehensive digital surveillance and control systems.These systems, which include contact tracing, digital identities, biometric face recognition and digital immunity certificates, are designed for totalitarian control of the entire population.In China, the full range of these inhuman technologies is already in use, which means that the most basic rights of citizens can be restricted by AI-based systems.

The combination of a ‘Corona app’ and a preliminary stage of digital immunity certificates is being used to automatically deprive citizens of their freedom of movement if their ‘health status’, as detected by the machine, does not meet the specifications.9 Cameras with facial recognition additionally record and identify every person in public space.

The 5G mobile phone standard enables this form of mass monitoring in real time.So in China digital technology determines who is still allowed to leave their home.Such a society can hardly be described as anything but a technocratic tyranny.I am sorry to say that similar plans are also being pursued by our own federal government.It, too, is already seeking to introduce a so-called ‘vaccination or immunity documentation system’, depriving people in our country of basic rights such as freedom of travel and freedom of assembly, or allowing them such rights only if they can prove immunity, e.g.

through vaccination.

10 These intentions are no different from those of the Chinese dictatorship, and it is only thanks to public protest in Germany that the government has not yet been able to pass this legislation in its original form.
Financial and digital groups set up global surveillance architecture
This year, the World Economic Forum will introduce the ‘CommonPass’, a system for international travel, likewise aimed at surveillance and control of access to public life and freedom of travel worldwide.This system requires people to have a kind of ‘digital identity’, as well as uploading their vaccination status and/or Corona test results to a database, in order to be able to travel at all.

11
The project is supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, Google, the major bank J.P.Morgan, the financial group BlackRock and representatives of the United Nations.

12 The aim of the institutions and companies involved is to encourage all governments worldwide to use the system.This again shows (besides the above-mentioned ‘Great Reset’) the global ambition of the corporations behind the project, and again the UN is being instrumentalised for their purposes.The question arises as to why the financial groups in particular have such a strong interest in monitoring and controlling people, and why they are willing to invest such a lot of money in the development of these technologies.
Return to normality only with digital surveillance?
Taking into account the current data situation on coronavirus, the German Ethics Council still advises against the introduction of such systems, but does not entirely exclude them for the future.13 It can therefore be assumed that digital immunity certificates or something like the CommonPass will be presented to us in the course of the coming months by the media and the government, as a prerequisite for a return to normality.

Several German companies already offer digital surveillance systems, which automatically check whether a person has normal body temperature and is wearing a mask.Some of these systems are already being combined with facial recognition, and manufacturers advertise them as providing ‘ effective real-time monitoring of faces with or without masks ’.14 Should these technologies be introduced in Germany, it would be a first step towards the Chinese social credit system.I do not want to accustom myself to the idea that such technology will soon be capable of determining our freedom of movement.My concern, however, is that some people would give up their individual freedom for a deceptive sense of security.But are such massive surveillance measures really a proportionate response to the coronavirus situation?
Edward Snowden warns against global architecture of oppression
In this context, I personally agree with Edward Snowden, who has warned against a worldwide architecture of repression using digital technology and suggested that it could outlive the crisis.

15 If we allow digital systems to control our freedom of movement and access to public life, by the same token we are giving control of our most fundamental rights over to the digital infrastructure operators.One look at China is enough for us to recognise the real dangers of such a technocratic form of society.
No one should have to live in a world like this, but because of our heedless attitude to the technically feasible we are all increasingly being pushed in this direction.This applies equally to Europe, even though at first glance we may find it hard to imagine.The fact that the 5G network, unlike the previous private mobile phone infrastructure in Germany, is being set up with a lot of tax money, speaks in this context for the fact that this technology will be used, in our country too, primarily for mass state surveillance.In the summer of 2019, at one of the numerous lobbying events in Berlin, I asked the Chief Technical Officer of the world’s largest network equipment supplier whether 5G is actually being developed for private users, and if so, for what specific applications the technology is intended to be used.

His answer, that 5G was being developed for ‘professional purposes’, reinforces my belief that this is by no means a matter of the needs of the population.It is therefore a perfidious approach by the federal government that it now wants to implement these old plans by using the money from a ‘Corona Recovery Package’.16
Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation collect biometric data of the world population
The introduction of digital identities was an objective even before the Corona crisis and was being promoted by influential players.With ‘ID2020’, the Rockefeller Foundation and Microsoft have been pursuing for several years now a project for the digital, biometric registration of the world’s population, with digital immunity certificates again described as a possible use for the system.17
A global vaccination campaign against coronavirus could soon be used as a pretext to roll out this control system, which has been prepared for years, worldwide – possibly in combination with the CommonPass mentioned earlier.

It is important to realise that this means that the identity of every citizen (passwords, health status, bank data, social contacts etc.) will be centrally managed and transmitted to private corporations – a shocking, but unfortunately quite realistic idea.If you look at this and other projects of the digital corporations, you get the feeling that for these companies we human beings are more of a commodity or an economically exploitable raw material, and that our welfare matters very little to them.For example, Microsoft has patented a system whereby human bodies equipped with sensors can be used for the mining of crypto-currencies.18 Seen from this angle, the 2017 Facebook project on Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) is even more surreal.The US billionaire Elon Musk has already developed a robot which implants micro-electronic chips fully automatically in human brains.

19 This hardly any longer falls in the category of medical applications, as even the developers no longer trouble to deny.
Are the corporations losing their grip?
I believe that we should immediately launch a broad debate on the ethical aspects of the above technologies.As with genetic cloning, we should also look at microchip implants in the brain to ask the question whether we really want to exploit all the technical possibilities available to us, or whether this form of transhumanism does not lead to dangerous dehumanisation.Is it really still ‘normal’, if mega-affluent people already announce today that they want to link people with an implanted chip into digital networks? 20 For what reason does Microsoft want to register the biometric ID of the entire world population? Should we enable companies with such intentions actually to set up a global surveillance architecture ‘because of Corona’, allowing them to gain access to all areas of our lives? And why do the media not ask these questions, but promote all these projects quite uncritically?
Corona brings the ‘brave new world’ – if we do not rapidly become more critical
Influential players, including international foundations, are already openly calling for permanent total surveillance of the entire population – of course ‘only’ because of coronavirus.21 None of these aspects should be left out of account, when we consider the efforts of certain philanthropists in this crisis.In any case, we should be more critical of investors who purchase our consent with strategically placed philanthropy, and who in spite of (or because of?) their supposedly selfless donations are becoming increasingly wealthy and influential.
The cumbersome and partially unfulfillable Corona requirements (e.g.contact diaries, guest lists, contact tracing by the authorities etc.) could encourage many people to accept digital surveillance systems as a convenient solution for everyday life.Should digital companies, the media and government see this Chinese path as key for a return to (new) normality, it should be clear to everyone what they are really aiming for.
In addition to the surveillance aspect, it should be noted that the digital industry has long been extending its business model, in the context of school digitisation, to the education sector as well, and Corona provides a welcome excuse for this.

I appeal to all parents and teachers not to be uncritical of these attempts.
These companies are not our friends and do not have the best interests of children, or the safeguarding of individual freedom in mind.First and foremost they want to create dependencies and make their technologies indispensable in all sectors of society.They are increasingly expanding into all areas of our lives, without our ever having really been made aware of it.The digitisation of government, payment transactions, schools, the economy, the media, communication and ultimately the whole of society is driven and financed worldwide by a very small number of large corporations.

Are we going to stand by and let these dependencies develop, as the Corona crisis leads to their being further expanded and permanently established?
How much surveillance and control can a free society cope with?
III.The financial sector, and in particular the large international and investment banks …are instrumentalising the crisis to create new dependencies through extensive lending to governments and companies, and thus extend their political influence.This is done either directly through banks or indirectly through organisations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.The acute need for capital as a result of the crisis thus makes states liable to be influenced by private donors.

Because of this balance of power, any democratic control becomes impossible and the private banking sector is becoming a major political player.
This approach is particularly questionable, because the billion-dollar loans are essentially not intended to support the population or the real economy, but (by analogy with previous ‘bank rescues’) mainly redound to the benefit of the creditors.The money borrowed is therefore only used to a limited extent by politicians in support of the economy, but rather saves the financial sector from losses due to the crisis.This redistribution is paid for by low and middle-income earners, because the enormous new debt is likely to give rise to massive tax increases and capital levies, at the latest after the coming federal elections.At the same time, the loans enable the big banks to exert political influence.Due to these mechanisms, they have an interest in ensuring that the economic crisis resulting from Corona shall be as devastating as possible, however absurd this may at first appear.

For this purpose they use the the channels open to them in the media to spread more fear and further exacerbate the economic situation.In addition, through institutions such as the IMF or the World Bank, they are promoting a shift of power in favour of supranational organisations, because this progressively increases their influence on global fiscal policy.
Major banks and the IMF have a big influence on the global response to the corona crisis
The financial sector is already a major player in foreign policy and in the global response to the corona pandemic.For example, when the ‘Event 201’ simulation was conducted in October 2019 by the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, participants with links to the World Bank were also present to discuss fiscal responses to a future coronavirus pandemic.22
The corona pandemic simulated for this purpose actually occurred two months later, and the measures developed in the context of the simulation have been implemented since then.This can be seen in the most recent events in Belarus.

The IMF, as the long arm of the banking sector, offered the economically stricken state 940 million in June 2020, demanding in return that the small country institute Corona measures such as lockdown, compulsory masking and quarantine.23 The background to these demands was that Belarus, with its restrained approach to coronavirus, had disrupted the desired narrative of the deadly pandemic.

Looking at the long list of 102 states that have requested IMF loans in the context of the Corona crisis, a similar IMF approach in these countries is quite conceivable.The IMF itself states that it makes lending conditional on ‘appropriate Corona measures’ by the recipient countries.24 Anyone who wonders why so many countries worldwide have adopted almost identical measures may find an answer here.Belarus rejected the interference of the IMF, and we are currently observing the consequences.

That the EU, given the current rate of exchange with Belarus, is not really concerned about the conduct of the possibly rigged elections, is shown from the fact that the OSCE initially turned down the country’s invitation to observe these elections locally with a meagre excuse.25
Corona helps banks achieve their goal of abolishing cash worldwide
In addition to the political aspects, the financial sector is abusing the crisis to continue to push ahead with the drive to global cash abolition.Unfortunately, many people are not aware of the impact of the switch to digital currencies and the enormous potential for abuse associated with this.At this point, I would urge everyone to consider the real consequences of a cashless society and in particular to reflect on the control that the operators of a global digital payment infrastructure would have over the entire population.

It should also be recognised that if cash were abolished these companies would make money from every payment transaction worldwide without exception, which I for one would have no wish to see happening.
Influential forces, which even before Corona were already intensively lobbying for global cash abolition, are now exploiting the crisis to achieve their goals.Let us just mention in passing that Microsoft founder Bill Gates is also involved in the project.26 In view of the enormous economic potential in this sector, it is in any case unlikely that such players in this sector will ultimately be concerned with anything other than money and political influence, even if they conceal their aims behind high-profile ‘fund-raising campaigns’.So when we are told that because of Corona we should give up using cash, we should not ignore the strong economic interests behind it.

In this context, it is worth mentioning that the UN is also using its name to promote this global campaign by the banking sector.27
The financial sector installs its people at the top and we do nothing about it
Overall, my observations in the Bundestag lead me to the conclusion that the financial sector is influencing politics with an astonishing degree of self-assurance, and is now even able to position its own staff in the highest political offices without provoking any kind of public protest.If Goldman Sachs managers or IMF chairmen can become President of the European Central Bank, the EU seems have lost any connection with the needs and interests of the population.

And if BlackRock representatives in Germany are touted as candidates for Chancellor, we appear to be too little informed about the intentions and methods of the financial sector, and so must be lacking a critical faculty.But we need be critical, if on the one hand the assets of billionaires go on steadily increasing while at the same time more and more people are living in poverty in our country.This development is no coincidence – it is just the result of decades of policy in favour of the richest 0.01 percent.

In the year 2010, when the Süddeutsche Zeitung was still critically reporting on the influence of the financial sector, former editor-in-chief Heribert Prantl wrote about these issues:
But we also need to talk about how we can bring it about that Europe should not just be dictated to by money and the financial markets – we need to restore power to the people’s representatives and the governments the people have elected.28
A vivid example of this influence of the financial sector on representatives of our federal government is the current CumEx scandal at the Warburg bank, where tax money to the tune of thousands of millions disappeared.Our own Federal Minister of Finance (then Mayor of Hamburg) ‘overlooked’ this theft, later thwarted the recovery of the funds, lied to the Finance Committee of the German Bundestag on the number of discussions he had had with Warburg representatives and says now, as the accusations can no longer be denied, that he cannot any longer recall what was discussed at these meetings.29 It is people like this, dear reader, who hold the most important positions in our federal government and decide how wealth in Germany is to be distributed.

The Warburg case provides a unique opportunity for the whole population to study the collusion between top-level politics and the financial sector.Although the affair itself is by no means an isolated case, it is only very rarely that the details of such conspiracies come to light.

So I hope that the opportunity does not just pass us by, and citizens do not yet again let themselves be fobbed off by dramatic appeals by political functionaries or mitigating media reports.
IV.With their misleading reporting …their encouragement of division and polarisation and the calculated fomentation of anxiety, the mainstream media are driving a deliberate wedge into our society.
Fear, in particular, is a handy tool for pressuring all of us to take measures that under normal circumstances we would never accept.Depending on the objective in view, the media variously disseminate fear of terrorism, of climate change or (as currently the case) of the pandemic.In this way they achieve social support for changes that are actually directed against the interests of the population.Their manipulative trick here is to play on our idealism and goodwill, e.g.

our tendency to support environmental conservation or the health of our fellow human beings.

The result of this influencing is always the same for the citizens concerned: a loss of freedom and prosperity and a further concentration of power in the hands of players who consistently elude our observation, and about whose objectives we are in no way informed.Occasionally it happens that prominent media representatives openly address these power relations in the media.Former Editor-in-Chief of the New York Times, John Swinton, said many years ago at a meeting of the most prestigious American journalists:
There is no such thing as an independent press in America, except in remote small towns in country districts.You are all slaves.You know it and I know it.Not one of you dares to express an honest opinion.

If you were to express it, you would already know in advance that it would never appear in print.[…] If I were to allow honest opinions to be printed in one issue of my newspaper, I would be like Othello before 24 hours had elapsed – my occupation would be gone.Anyone crazy enough to write his honest opinion would be out on the streets looking for a new job.The business of journalists in New York is to twist the truth, to lie bluntly, to pervert, to revile, to kowtow at the feet of big business (‘Mammon’ in the original) and to sell his own country and people for his daily bread, or, which is the same thing, for his salary.

You know it and I know it; what garbage it is, proposing a toast to the ‘independence of the press’! We are tools and servants of the rich men behind the scenes.We are their jumping jacks.

They pull the strings and we dance.Our time, our skills, our lives, our possibilities are all owned by other people.

We are intellectual prostitutes.30
I am afraid that in this area nothing at all has changed.On the contrary, by this time even smaller regional media can hardly take up a neutral position, because they derive the greater part of their news from a few central press agencies, and when it comes to issues beyond the immediate region no longer do their own research.So today it is that much easier to keep disquieting opinions out of the media.The private and public media, as well as the social networks, thus ensure that people are distracted from the crucial background to important happenings and accept the official narrative they are expected to swallow.In parallel to this society is forced, obviously with the aim of distraction, to engage in unnecessary debates on completely irrelevant issues.Anyone who has taken a closer look at these scientifically developed methods of manipulating opinion will realise that the approach is systematic and is by no means just being applied by chance.31
The pictures from Bergamo: 70% of the undertakers in the region were obliged to isolate, so they asked the military for a one-off transport of 60 coffins.
How were the ‘Pictures from Bergamo’ created?
The media also make use of the power of images and use them in a targeted way.

They shock us with photographs of alleged Corona mass graves in the USA, while concealing the fact that deceased homeless people have been buried in these communal burial grounds for many years (and video recordings to that effect were being made back in 2016).

32 They show us dramatic images of military trucks transporting coffins from Bergamo in northern Italy and at the same time suppress the important information that, according to the Italian Funeral Industry Federation, at the start of the corona crisis 70 per cent of undertakers in the region stopped working for reasons of quarantine, and it was only because of this that the military was called in for a one-off transport of 60 coffins.33 The media groups and public service broadcasters rely on the fact that we citizens do not have the time for background research, and will therefore be forced to trust their reports.But why is their reporting so very selective? And do we not make it far too easy for the media to influence our opinion?
Even Wikipedia is no longer neutral
Even Wikipedia, with its enormous reach and acceptance among the population, has for some time now been selling itself to lucrative PR campaigns by large corporations and wealthy individuals.34 At the same time, it is increasingly becoming a digital pillory for people outside the mainstream.For example, Wikipedia has systematically blackened the reputation of numerous renowned scientists, such as Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier, although they were among the most respected in their field even before Corona.This approach is particularly underhand because it is impossible to defend oneself against this form of public defamation, and the internal Wikipedia regime prevents any correction.Another cause for concern is the current trend whereby uncomfortable facts about coronavirus are brusquely denied on the basis of so-called ‘fact checks’, and unpopular views subjected to denigration.
Corona narrative is impressed on children with computer games
Public service broadcasters are also participating in current Corona propaganda, and do not hold back, in this context, from deliberately influencing children.

For example, ARD and ZDF are developing a contribution-financed Corona computer game for young people, in which players have to give a wide berth to ‘highly infectious infants’ and ‘conspiracy theorists’.35 I leave it to my readers to decide whether such public relations work, paid for by subscribers, can be seen as a serious response to the pandemic.
Dear Readers,
you probably have little time to check the background to all these statements for yourselves with a view to forming your own opinion about it.Governments around the world have long been trying, in close cooperation with the media and the digital economy, to deprive you of this opportunity by means of censorship.

36 This is supposedly justified by allegedly dangerous ‘conspiracy theories’, but the aim envisaged is in no way the protection of the population against false reports, but the repression of uncomfortable facts and opinions.Already now, especially on the major online platforms, content is being arbitrarily deleted, this always being justified as ‘protection against disinformation’.But when we allow alternative views to be censored on spurious grounds, not only do we renounce our fundamental rights of freedom of expression and freedom of the press, at the same time we accept a total dependence on the media, the digital companies and the statements of politicians.

The nervous response of our government to any criticism of its Corona measures shows that it has reason at present to be seriously concerned about who controls people’s opinions.When critical voices are widely defamed in the media, while hardly being allowed a say in the matter, this again points to their fear that public opinion could escape their control.

But if we now grant the Government the right to empower itself, or its authorised institutions, to act as a kind of ‘Ministry of Truth’, how can this be compatible with our claim to be an open and liberal society?
Democracy is undermined by lobbying and the suppression of uncomfortable opinions
I am afraid, in view of all these machinations, we must draw a very uncomfortable conclusion.We must seriously consider the possibility that on many important issues we are being deliberately and intentionally deceived, and that not only the media, but also our political leaders are doing this, to our general detriment.Anyone who has ever experienced the repulsive moral cowardice that predominates in the Bundestag and in our ministries can no longer have any illusions about the integrity of our Government.The Bundestag is a self-regulating system in which everyone is subject to pressures which leave just a narrow corridor of tolerated opinions.

This applies in particular when it comes to the influence of the mega corporations and major banks – these interrelationships are largely taboo, and are also hushed up in non-public committee meetings, even though most major policy decisions are linked to them.If anyone at this point suggests that my statements bring democracy into disrepute, they haven’t thought very hard about it.On the contrary, I want democracy to be restored in the interest of us ordinary citizens.Because once you have been able to witness with what arrogant certainty billionaires influence political decision-making, democracy is the last word that is likely to come to mind.
Church representatives issue warning
Even high-ranking Church representatives have recognised the seriousness of the situation and are warning us about the intentions of financially strong players in this crisis.

They remind us that Corona is like a fire accelerant for their efforts, and the ensuing centralisation of political and economic power will soon escape all democratic control.They also point to the dangers of digital surveillance for the individual freedom of each person.

It speaks volumes about the intentions of the media that they dismiss this sincere warning from the Church hierarchy as a malicious ‘conspiracy theory’.I fully endorse the call of the bishops and cardinals at this point, and at the same time thank them for having the courage to stand up against the broad front made up of the media, governments and large parts of their own Church, with their well-considered warning .
State of emergency and ‘New Normal’ are being vigorously enforced worldwide
We should become suspicious, if we are now being forced to accept considerable restrictions and permanent changes to our lives.

Under no circumstances should we yield to the conspicuously slanted message of politics and the media, according to which we must permanently write off our old life and there is no alternative to the ‘new normal’.Because there is always an alternative.And if the Robert Koch Institute and Professor Christian Drosten are already suggesting that the current state of emergency, including the obligation to wear masks, needs to be extended indefinitely, something is getting seriously out of hand.37, 38
So we are supposed to believe that the state of emergency is to become a permanent state of affairs, worldwide.

It is only to be expected that practically all the world’s mainstream media, along with the most influential international organisations such as the UN, WHO, IMF, the World Economic Forum and the World Bank, should be emphatically forcing this message of the ‘new normal’ down people’s throats worldwide.39 But will they succeed? And what does that actually do for children, if they are to live under such circumstances for years at the most important stage of their development?
People are mature enough to take responsibility for themselves
We all have a right gradually to reclaim a degree of personal responsibility.I would therefore argue that we should deal with the realities of the current situation on our own responsibility and without state coercion.According to all known studies, distance is the most effective protection against an infection, and it is reasonable for any responsible citizen to act on this knowledge if appropriate.

But we should defend ourselves when disproportionate measures are forced on us.
Does the corona crisis really justify isolating old and sick residents of nursing homes without their consent, separating children from their parents for forced quarantine (as proposed by health authorities in several federal states) or locking up citizens with a positive PCR test against their will in police-guarded facilities (as recently happened in Munich)? And when it comes to equipping people with micro-electronic distance sensors (so-called ‘Corona bracelets’), is this not a deeply degrading, totalitarian measure and, given the situation, completely overdone? The managing director of a a company making these distance sensors recently suggested, in a radio interview, that it would be a good thing if the entire population were so equipped.40 I hope that I am not alone my opinion when I say that this proposal is altogether perverse and the product of a sick mind.
No benefits from everyday mask-wearing have been proven
Equally questionable is the obligation to wear a mask in public, especially without standardisation of the material used for this purpose.The Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, as the competent higher federal authority, states that for non-medical masks no protective effect has been demonstrated, either for wearers themselves or for others.41 It is characteristic that the authority then goes on, in spite of the state of current scientific data, to insinuate a pseudo-protective effect on the basis of vague formulations, even though such an effect has been shown to be non-existent just a few sentences earlier.
Contrary to the assertions of various politicians, there is still no scientific proof that it makes sense to mandate the wearing of masks for the general population in public places.Medical (!) masks only have a proven beneficial effect in the case of close, continuous contact in closed rooms.

The evidence suggests that the misuse of masks, currently to be observed in large numbers of the population, actually increases the risk of infection.42 This is because hardly anyone adheres to the stipulation that the outside of the mask must never be touched, that the mask must be changed after four hours, hands should be washed before and after each use, and masks should not be used repeatedly but must be washed in hot water each time they are used.
Political decision-makers should be clear that such requirements cannot possibly be met in everyday life, and it is therefore highly probable that the damage caused by the masks outweighs the benefit, not to mention the devastating effects on social life.I therefore concur with Professor Christian Drosten, who emphasised the ineffectiveness of masks back in January 2020.

43
In this context, I would like to remind you of the statements made by the Federal Chancellor and the Bavarian Prime Minister, according to which everyday masks become dangerous ‘virus breeders’ so the obligation to wear a mask must be rejected.The Vice-President of the Robert Koch Institute, Professor Lars Schaade, also commented on 28.02.2020 on the use of masks in the Corona pandemic:
Well, masks…this has been looked into several times.

There is simply no scientific evidence that masks make any kind of sense.44
This statement is also supported by the official figures of the RKI itself, because the introduction of compulsory mask-wearing at the end of April had no positive effect at all on the R-value and the already declining infection figures.

45 Currently, the figures are rising in despite of the compulsory wearing of masks in public places.The Bavarian Ministry of Health itself provided a plausible explanation for this, for it stated on its influenza information page (until early October 2020):
The risk of infection can be reduced by a tight-fitting mouth and nose guard (as used in surgery and intensive care).Single layer masks are however ineffective.

The general wearing of breathing masks or mouth and nose guards by the general population during an influenza pandemic is unlikely to lead to any significant reduction in the transmission of influenza viruses and is therefore not recommended.Every contact person could be a source of infection.Family members, especially children, and friends are a much more likely source of infection, because of the closer contact involved, than random persons you fleetingly pass on the underground.It follows that the mouth and nose protector should be worn constantly, including at home, to be effective; but this is hardly practical.46
Ministry of Health contradicts itself on everyday mask wearing
So for years, the ministry stated on its influenza page that because of the possibility of infection in the domestic environment, mandatory mask-wearing was pointless.

On the coronavirus page, however, the mask is praised as a lifesaver, although here too most infections (after nursing homes) tend to occur at home.47 In the meantime this nonsensical statement has been quietly reworded, because with corona viruses everything is suddenly ‘different’ and masks must now even be worn in the open air.
However this may be, I have no doubt that such measures systematically weaken the physical and mental defences of the population.In this context, it should be mentioned that the German Bundestag warned all members of parliament and parliamentary employees in an internal memo of the danger represented by the significant accumulation of CO2 in the blood during prolonged mask-wearing.48 However, citizens were denied this important information, and the facts about CO2 rebreathing were even denied subsequently by pseudo-scientific ‘fact-checks’.49 The general obligation to wear a mask is therefore a purely psychological tool on the part of governments, and in view of the self-contamination it entails can even be potentially hazardous to health – the aim here being to keep the population in fear, by forcibly reiterating the official narrative of an omnipresent danger.
This approach is in keeping with the strategy of the Federal Ministry of the Interior for Corona crisis communication management, according to which ‘the primeval human fear of suffocation’ should be systematically exploited to achieve the ‘desired shock effect’ in the population.50 I leave it to my readers to decide what view to take of this deliberate inculcation of terror by our federal government.

It should not go unmentioned at this point that this ‘desired shock effect’ is highly likely to traumatise young children in particular, and to make them afraid of other people for the rest of their lives.We can already observe how many citizens, as a result of their fear of the virus, have developed a completely disturbed pattern of social behaviour and now perceive their fellow human beings only as a threat.

Anyone who has read this strategy paper of the Ministry of the Interior, with its complete lack of empathy, knows the people who are responsible for this fearful social damage.
Is it justifiable, in the light of scientific data, to make children wear masks for long periods of time and in the open air?
Proof of immunity means compulsory vaccination by indirect means
Our fundamental rights, and our unconditional and unlimited access to public life, are non-negotiable.In this context, indirect compulsory vaccination, such as the so-called immunity pass would entail (in connection with a scarcely tested, probably genetically engineered vaccine), must be firmly rejected.

As compared with the potential danger of coronavirus, the risks involved here would appear to be incalculable.As a grim reminder of this, we need only refer back to the hasty introduction of vaccines against swine flu, which caused tragic vaccination damage, particularly to children.

51 It should also be noted that in the course of the EU-mandated pharmaceutical company’s testing of the Corona vaccine, one volunteer suffered severe side effects in the form of an inflammation of the spinal cord.52 It is not without reason that the development of a safe vaccine takes up to 20 years.53 Those who want to be vaccinated should accordingly sign up on a voluntary basis.But the Corona crisis must not lead to a situation where our everyday life and our social interaction are dehumanised through permanent coercion, because I have no doubt that a breakdown of society would be the result.

We must therefore watch closely to see whether the federal government (or the EU) will at a later stage again try to make our return to normality dependent on conditions such as proof of immunity or the like.This would be going way beyond their remit.
Not trivialising the virus, but not ignoring new findings
Corona is not a completely harmless virus.However, in the meantime we have a new level of knowledge which we must also now take into account.

In addition, it must be clarified immediately to what extent treatment errors in medication and ventilation of Covid patients contributed to premature deaths.

54 55 We should therefore not prematurely allow the tragic events in some regions of the world to be the yardstick for our further handling of the problem.
The latest antibody studies in particular show that significantly more people have already had the virus than was initially assumed.56 The values published so far regarding the case fatality rate are accordingly no longer tenable.So we need to find new ways of dealing with the virus, ones that do less harm to society.Above all, we should favour a return to greater personal responsibility, because state intervention in the private sector will in the long run be a threat to social peace.And when the Federal Chancellor literally says that it is necessary to ‘tighten the reins’ on the population, it seems someone has forgotten who actually is (or should be) sovereign in a democracy.
Devastating collateral damage and human suffering in developing countries
There is some evidence that the measures taken are having increasingly unmanageable effects.Federal Development Minister Müller (CSU) recently stated that the coronavirus measures will result in far more deaths than those caused by the virus itself.

57 In particular in developing countries, as a result of the lockdowns, the supply chains for key medicines, e.g.for tuberculosis, HIV and malaria, are in a state of partial collapse.In African countries, we can therefore expect the continuation of these measures to result in several million excess deaths.58, 59, 60 To protect ourselves, we are thus turning a blind eye to significantly more victims in other countries.

It is probable too that there will be a time lag between the measures and the devastating impact on global food supplies, and that the shortages will particularly affect the poorest.
Development Minister Gerd Müller warns that far more people are dying from the lockdowns than from the virus itself.This is particularly true of developing countries.
The cure should not be worse than the disease – and Corona is no exception
In Germany, well over one million operations were postponed because of coronavirus, including 50,000 urgent operations for cancer.

Estimates suggest that the absence of treatment could cause between 5,000 and 125,000 people to lose their lives.

In addition, countless other people die because they are no longer receiving treatment for fear of the virus, even when their lives are at risk.61 So is the government really concerned about saving lives? In any case, I would like to express my agreement with a concerned employee of the Ministry of the Interior, who presented a detailed report on the subject in early May about the human suffering resulting from the corona measures, and was coldly sacked by the government for his pains.

We have long since reached the point where the damage of these measures exceeds the benefits.

In view of the data now available, we must therefore try to find a restrained approach to the pandemic – because the virus is here to stay, after all, and we cannot sacrifice on its altar our entire social coexistence, our culture, the development and education of our children, the economy, our spiritual integrity and ultimately our freedom.
This statement seems apposite today, for it has already been announced that current measures should be continued even after the introduction of a vaccine.Moreover, we have to accept the fact that there just are incalculable risks in life, and this brings me to the most important statement in my report:
We should all assess the situation objectively and rationally, even if another ‘Corona wave’ leads to more fatalities or if we are confronted with a completely novel virus, which is a definite possibility.62 If this does indeed occur, it is likely that an attempt will be made to implement all the above measures within the shortest possible time.I can only urge most strongly that this should not be allowed to happen.
Even with possible excess mortality, advice based on fear is dubious
I cannot prove it, but I think it is conceivable that in the further course of the pandemic Germany will experience excess mortality.

This because the omnipresent fear of the virus, the psychological consequences of social isolation and also the physical effects of the current measures (masks, excessive and unhealthy hygiene, lack of exercise) have considerably weakened the immune system of many people.However, I would urge my fellow citizens, even in case of higher fatalities, not rashly to accept measures that would later result in extremely violent repercussions to the detriment of their own best interests.The machinations I have described in this report are and will remain a real threat to the freedom of all of us, to our social and economic well-being.And if you think about it, you cannot avoid coming to the disconcerting conclusion that a high level of anxiety in the population, and the worst kind of economic devastation, would play into the hands of these sinister projects.I am aware how absurd this sounds, but my close examination of the situation makes such a conclusion inescapable.We should therefore, even in difficult and confusing times, keep a critical eye on those who see in every crisis a business model above all, and a favourable opportunity to expand their own power.We should also remember that fear is and always has been a bad basis for decisions.
Unfortunately, not everyone on this earth applies the same moral standards to their actions as we ordinary citizens try to do in our everyday lives.We must face up to this fact, even if it is difficult.

Because if we are to recognise who is instrumentalising this crisis for their own purposes, we cannot spare ourselves this logical step.
The purpose of my report was to highlight the alien purposes for which our concerns about coronavirus are being abused.Furthermore, I wanted to bring it about that people in our country can have a public debate on these issues, because the media and politicians have so far used every possible means to prevent it.I hope that I will succeed in both, and that many readers will critically review my comments and concerns.
Finally, I would like to make an appeal to all soldiers and police officers in our country.Even before corona, governments all over the world had embarked on a new course from which they are unlikely to retreat.After many decades of great freedom and economic prosperity, the world is apparently once again moving towards authoritarian forms of government with mass surveillance, censorship and extensive control of the population.Many people have recognised these tendencies and rightly resist them.

It is also very likely that in the coming months and years, more and more citizens will come to realise that their freedom and prosperity are under serious threat.
It is equally likely that this realisation will lead to widespread protests against government and the power of the global mega-corporations.If this should happen, I appeal to all soldiers and policemen not to forget to whose protection you have actually committed your services.Remember that a state that serves only the interests of a profit-oriented minority is also a threat to your freedom and that of your families.It is no coincidence that the concentration of wealth in the hands of the few is increasing unchecked, while at the same time leaving the general population with less and less and making them ever more dependent.
The media and politicians are already desperately trying to present protests against all these developments as coming from the extreme right.They do not even shy away from brazen misrepresentations, as their coverage of the protests against the corona measures impressively demonstrates.Should my report reach a wider audience, I too will certainly also be put in the corner of the right-wing extremists, conspiracy theorists or citizens nostalgic for the German Reich.This would not matter to me, because it is only a matter of time before citizens will see through this hateful propaganda against divergent opinions.

In the end, the good will and genuine solidarity of the people will assert themselves.I have no doubt about that.
To conclude this report, I have two questions for my fellow human beings:
What Government measures would finally cause you personally to draw the line?
And what will you do if the ‘new normal’ of social distancing, masks and the de facto ban on culture remains, even after the introduction of a vaccine?
Further reading:
Prof.Dr.Rainer Mausfeld, Warum schweigen die Lämmer?
Dr.Sahra Wagenknecht, Couragiert gegen den Strom and Freiheit statt Kapitalismus
Prof.

Dr.Klaus-Jürgen Bruder, Digitalisierung – Sirenengesänge oder Schlachtruf einer kannibalistischen Weltordnung
Paul Schreyer, Wer regiert das Geld and Chronik einer angekündigten Krise
Edward Bernays, Propaganda
Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited
Publishing details:
Sebastian Friebel
Schellingstr.

109a,
80798 München,
GERMANY
Telegram:
t.me/Wiesollesweitergehen
Twitter:
@es_soll
1 www.weforum.org/great-reset ; 2020
2 “Why we need international cooperation now more than ever”; www.weforum.org ; 22.09.2020
3 “What COVID-19 could mean for international cooperation”; www.weforum.org ; 17.06.2020
4 Barbara Adams, Jens Martens, The UN Foundation – A foundation for the UN? ; 2018
5 The Great Reset: A Unique Twin Summit to Begin 2021 ; www.weforum.org ; 2020
6 Die Pandemie ist eine große Chance [The pandemic is a great opportunity]; www.wolfgang-schaeuble.de ; 21.08.2020
7 Sahra Wagenknecht, Couragiert gegen den Strom [Courageously against the current]; 2 nd edition, p.156; Westend-Verlag [Westend publishers]; 2017
8 “ How to Adapt to the Digital Age ”; 17.06.2016
9 “Coronavirus: So funktioniert Chinas Farbcode-System ” [Coronavirus: Here’s how China’s colour code system works]; www.rnd.de ; 16.04.2020
10 “Formulierungshilfe für den Entwurf eines Zweiten Gesetzes zum Schutz der Bevölkerung bei einer epidemischen Lage von nationaler Tragweit” [Formulation aid for the draft of a second law for the protection of the population in the event of an epidemic situation of national scope]; www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de ; 29.04.2020
11 CommonPass; www.weforum.org ; 2020
12 “The Commons Project Establishes Global Board of Trustees”; www.thecommonsproject.org ; 08.07.2020
13 “Deutscher Ethikrat rät derzeit von Covid-19-Immunitätsbescheinigungen ab” [German Ethics Council currently advises against Covid-19 immunity certificates]; www.ethikrat.org ; 22.09.2020
14 “Erkennungssoftware soll Maskenverweigerer identifizieren” [Recognition software to identify mask refusers]; www.rnd.de ; 19.09.2020
15 “Corona-Maßnahmen: Snowden warnt vor ‘Architektur der Unterdrückung’”[Corona measures: Snowden warns against ‘architecture of oppression’]; www.heise.de ; 11.04.2020
16 “Eckpunktepapier Konjunkturpaket” [Key issues paper on the economic stimulus package]; www.bundesfinanzministerium.de ; 03.06.2020
17 www.id2020.org/alliance
18 Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data ; Patent WO/2020/060606 bzw.US16138518; 26.03.2020
19 “An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels”; www.biorxiv.org ; 02.08.2019
20 “Chip stellt Verbindung zwischen Gehirn und Smartphone her” [Chip creates connection between brain and smartphone]; www.tagesspiegel.de ; 29.08.2020
21 “National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan”; www.rockefellerfoundation.org ; 21.04.2020
22 www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/ ; 2019
23 Lukashenko on imposition of additional conditions; www.deu.belta.by ; 19.06.2020
24 The IMF’s Response to COVID-19; www.imf.org ; 29.06.2020
25 “ODIHR will not deploy election observation mission to Belarus due to lack of invitation”; www.osce.org ; 15.07.2020
26 www.betterthancash.org/members
27 www.betterthancash.org/members/page/8
28 “Geld regiert die Welt – wer regiert das Geld?” [Money rules the world – who rules the money?]; www.sueddeutsche.de ; 20.05.2010
29 “Olaf Scholz mit Vorwürfen im Fall der Warburg-Bank konfrontiert” [Olaf Scholz faces accusations in Warburg Bank case]; www.bundestag.de ; 09.09.2020
30 E.J.

Schellhous, The new republic – founded on the natural and inalienable rights of man , p.122; www.archive.org ; 1883
31 Edward Bernays, Propaganda – Die Kunst der Public Relations [Propaganda – the art of public relations]; 1928; first German edition 2019
32 “The Potter´s Field”; www.youtube.com ; 2016
33 “Coronavirus, Federazione Onoranze Funebri” [Italian Undertakers Federation]; www.adnkronos.com ; 24.03.2020
34 Helen Buyniski, Wikipedia: “Ein Sumpf aus üblen Machenschaften” [Wikipedia: A swamp of evil machinations]; 2018
35 www.playcoronaworld.com ; 2020
36 “Innenminister wollen gegen Verschwörungstheorien vorgehen” [Home ministers aim to take action against conspiracy theories]; www.mdr.de ; 09.05.2020
37 Christian Drosten: “Wir haben es selbst in der Hand” [It’s in our hands]; www.zeit.de ; 06.10.2020
38 “Die Pandemie in Deutschland in den nächsten Monaten” [The pandemic in Germany in coming months]; www.rki.de ; 13.10.2020
39 13.10.2020
39 “Invasion of the New Normals”; www.consentfactory.org; 09.08.2020
40 “Firmenportrait: Kinexon – Abstandshalter für den US-Sport” [Company portrait: Kinexon – distance sensor for US sport]; www.deutschlandfunk.de ; from minute 05:06; 28.08.2020
41 BfArM information on the use of mouth and nose coverings; www.bfarm.de ; 26.06.2020
42 “Mund-Nasen-Schutz in der Öffentlichkeit: Keine Hinweise für eine Wirksamkeit” [Mouth-nose guards in public spaces: no indication that they are effective]; www.thieme-connect.com ; 18.08.2020
43 RBB interview mit Professor Christian Drosten; www.youtube.com ; from minute 25:58; 30.01.2020
44 Daily press briefing by the Robert Koch Institute on COVID-19 in Germany; www.youtube.com ; 28.02.2020
45 Table with Nowcasting figures for R-number estimates; www.rki.de ; 12.10.2020
46 “Grippe (Influenza) – Häufig gestellte Fragen” [Flu – FAQs]; www.stmgp.bayern.de ; 2020
47 Epidemiologisches Bulletin [Epidemiological Bulletin] 38/2020; www.rki.de ; 17.09.2020
48 House communication 222/2020; German Bundestag; 28.08.2020
49 “Nein, beim Tragen eines Mundschutzes atmet man nicht zu viel CO2 ein” [No, wearing a mouth guard does not mean that you inhale too much CO2]; www.correctiv.org ; 24.04.2020
50 Strategy paper ‘Wie wir COVID19 unter Kontrolle bekommen’ [‘How we can get COVID19 under control’]; www.bmi.bund.de ; 28.04.2020
51 Grippeimpfung: Wie Pandemrix eine Narkolepsie auslöst [Flu vaccination: how Pandemrix causes narcolepsy]; www.aerzteblatt.de ; 02.07.2015
52 AstraZeneca stoppt Covid-19-Impfstoff [AstraZeneca stops Covid-19 vaccine]; www.focus.de ; 09.09.2020
53 Development of vaccines – see www.aerztezeitung.at ; 15.12.2017
54 “COVID-19: Kleinere Studie mit Chloroquin wegen Komplikationen abgebrochen” [COVID-19: Small-scale study with chloroquine discontinued due to complications]; www.aerzteblatt.de ; 14.04.2020
55 “Invasive and non-invasive ventilation of COVID-19 patients” – see www.aerzteblatt.de ; 03.08.2020
56 Ischgl study: 42.4% are antibody-positive; www.i-med.ac.at ; 25.06.2020
57 “Entwicklungsminister: An Lockdown-Folgen sterben mehr Menschen als am Virus” [Development minister states more peple will die because of lockdown impact than through the virus]; www.reuters.com ; 23.09.2020
58 “The potential impact of health service disruptions on the burden of malaria”; www.who.int ; 23.04.2020
59 COVID-19-related service disruptions could cause hundreds of thousands of extra deaths from HIV, www.who.int ; 11.05.2020
60 “Majority of HIV, TB and Malaria Programs Face Disruptions as a Result of COVID-19”; www.theglobalfund.org ; 17.06.2020
61 Coronakrise 2020 aus Sicht des Schutzes Kritischer Infrastrukturen [Coronacrisis 2020 from the point of view of the protection of critical infrastructures]; report KM 4 of the BMI; 08.05.2020
62 A Special Edition of Path Forward with Bill and Melinda Gates ; minute 06:30 to 06:59; 23.06.2020
Source: Lockdown Sceptics
The Digger’s Purpose and Standards
This site does not have a particular political position.We welcome articles from various points of view, and civil debate when differences arise.
Contributions of articles from posters are always welcome.Unless a contribution is really beyond the pale, we do not edit what goes up as topics for discussion.If you would like to contribute an article, let one of the moderators know.

Likewise if you would like to become an official contributor so you can put up articles yourself, but for that we need to exchange email addresses and we need a Google email address from you.
Contributions can be anything, including fiction, poems, cartoons, or songs.

They can be your own writing or someone else’s writing which has yet to be published.
We understand that tempers flare during heated conversations, and we’re willing to overlook the occasional name-calling in that situation, although we do not encourage it.We also understand that some people enjoy pushing buttons and that cussing them out may be an understandable response, although we do not encourage that ei ther.

What we will not tolerate is a pattern of harassment and/or lies about other posters.
.

Leave a Reply

Next Post

The 2-Minute Rule for Money Robot

The 2-Minute Rule for Money Robot The 2-Minute Rule for Money Robot Category: Blog Virtually all top rated bitcoin robot software program to choose from promise to help you traders produce a least gain of $ten,000 each day.Having said that, the returns count on the invested capital.The software package can also be the only blogs…

Subscribe US Now