A Vision for Digital Property Rights, Feat. Nic Carter

admin

On one hand, the bitcoin industry has matured to include traditional brokerages and institutional traders.On the other, bitcoin privacy tech is still shrouded in a legal gray zone. The Human Rights Foundation (HRF) took a strong stance on bitcoin privacy tech Wednesday by announcing its new Bitcoin Developer Fund.The first $50,000 grant from the fund…

imageOn one hand, the bitcoin industry has matured to include traditional brokerages and institutional traders.On the other, bitcoin privacy tech is still shrouded in a legal gray zone.
The Human Rights Foundation (HRF) took a strong stance on bitcoin privacy tech Wednesday by announcing its new Bitcoin Developer Fund.The first $50,000 grant from the fund has been awarded to freelance CoinSwap developer Chris Belcher.
CoinSwap, a mixing technique originally invented in 2013 by Greg Maxwell, is part of a comprehensive suite of privacy tools being developed by bitcoin advocates.
“The fund’s next gift, already earmarked for another developer working on strengthening Bitcoin pseudonymity at the network level, will be announced later this summer,” Alex Gladstein, the HRF’s chief strategy officer, said in an email.
HRF will also crowdsource fundraising for such privacy tech, he added, using both dollars and bitcoin, while making it “possible for activists to more safely receive donations, earn income and continue their important work under increased financial pressure.”
Belcher said he hopes to have a primitive testnet available near the end of the year.
“It will be a bit like Lightning , where there’s never a single day when it’s finished, but it slowly gets more and better features and bug fixes until one day you realize it’s everywhere,” Belcher said of CoinSwap, which he plans to keep as an open source hobby project and not a revenue-producing company.
Related: Human Rights Foundation Funds Bitcoin Privacy Tools Despite ‘Coin Mixing’ Legal Stigma
Theoretically, any wallet provider could use the open source code to add the feature to their mobile app or desktop app.Privacy-focused wallets could even use CoinSwap features as another layer to current CoinJoin offerings.
Read more: Samourai Wallet Releases Privacy-Enhancing CoinJoin Feature
“The bitcoin ecosystem could end up in a bad situation where it’s impossible to accept bitcoin as payment without consulting some centralized blacklist … so I talk a lot about privacy but fungibility is important too,” Belcher said.“Centralization also makes the privacy of the software worse, so I’m less interested in going in that direction … it’s all about tradeoffs.”
Adam Fiscor, co-founder of zkSNACKs, said the next Wasabi Research Club will examine CoinSwaps, though he said it would be premature to comment on it further.
Both CoinSwaps and CoinJoins are a type of non-custodial mixing, which could theoretically be layered as two privacy tools used in the same transaction.CoinSwaps are comparable to atomic swaps , while CoinJoin options typically pool disparate funds together as part of the transaction.
Read more: 100 Bitcoin Users Perform What Might Be Largest ‘CoinJoin’ Transaction Ever
However, some compliance officers at leading analytics companies and crypto exchanges treat mixed bitcoin as inherently suspicious, which influences how legal authorities view the technology as well.It remains to be seen if CoinSwap features will suffer from the same stigmas as the incumbent method, CoinJoin.
CoinJoin The technologists working with bitcoin privacy tech walk a delicate line, and tend to pay their lawyers accordingly.
Attorney Preston Bryne said he would not advise clients to use CoinJoin transactions, which he said is sometimes wrongly associated with money laundering.Many exchanges and wallet companies choose to be safe rather than sorry when it comes to legal battles.
Yet, lawyer Rafael Yakobi said there’s nothing inherently wrong with using this privacy feature, it’s all about how you report it.

In the case of wallet providers, this may be possible in non-custodial scenarios where the intermediating startup never controls the assets.
“I’m quite confident that CoinJoin has not yet been mentioned in any piece of legislation.It’s not even mentioned by name in FinCEN’s guidance ,” Yakobi said.“The more appropriate question is whether flagging CoinJoin transactions is implicitly required by the relevant regulations.I’m not sure about Europe, but in the U.S.it’s not an objective yes or no answer.Each business is required to formulate best practices designed to comply with the law.”
Over in Europe, it appears the law enforcement agency Europol is wary of the privacy-oriented Wasabi Wallet , because the analytics firm Chainalysis estimated $15 million worth of illicit transactions used the bitcoin wallet’s CoinJoin feature..

Leave a Reply

Next Post

Unsecured databases targeted least 18 times every day by hackers

Unsecured databases left exposed on the web are targeted by cyber criminals at least eighteen times each day for as long as they remain exposed, research by Comparitech has revealed. The security firm, that over the past few years has found a large number of unsecured databases owned by large corporations exposed on the web,…
Unsecured databases targeted least 18 times every day by hackers

Subscribe US Now