AUTHOR,.CLAYTON L BROWN, DATE,.4-30-2020
VIDEO POKER AND THE LEAST LIKELIHOOD OF DIABLO: KIDS
BLIZZARD GAMES — THE COMING OF DIABLE 4 — PROBABLY NEVER, OR NOT FOR A WHILE.
But first here’s a quote from Anthony Fauci about basketball games,.
“You can’t just leap over things and get into a situation where you’re really tempting a rebound,” – he said.
Here’s my theory;
Blizzard Entertainment should produce a game similar to Diablo, in fact exactly like Diablo, in fact; make another Diablo, start right now, and produce the game to appeal to and feature graphics for children.Recreate Diablo 1 with funny rounded kids graphics and instead of violent blood make it kid like.
Essentially, take the game and turn it into a Mario.Diablo jacked up on Mario juice.Imagine what it would be like to play Diablo with the graphics of N64 Mario World.That would be so cool.
That’s all I thought of and because I don’t play video games and don’t intend to play the fourth iteration of Diablo I don’t care.It only seemed like franchises nowadays are so mature looking and trying so hard to be realistic they lose the essential beauty and fun of what made video games what they are today.
If ever there is a company that tries to make games for kids they always mix everything up and miss the point of kids games.Kids games should not need to be stupid or super boring; instead they should be good enough for older kids like teenagers or even adults.
If you are going to make a game for kids it should be a game adults are jealous of because they secretly wish they could play too.I always liked Diablo 1 for it’s realness yet lacking all actual aspects of realness.A classic role playing aerial view skill game.
The more the games zoom in on the characters the more realistic they become.Why is that though? Why do games have to become reality in order for people to enjoy them,.
Next idea.
Use zoom like technology to provide people with realtime online tournament poker and other such poor man’s games where you physically interact and see your competitors from around the world.I only made this up right now while I was writing this for the sake of writing the post.
For all the technology available they sure don’t find many interesting ways to incorporate into the game world of entertainment.What’s so fun about sitting on your computer talking to people through the phone.
It’s a phone with a video feed.That’s not that great.If it was online poker it would be cool to see and would give the opportunity for losers like me to play against and see real people considering I’m never going to be on the television poker tournaments competing for millions of dollars.Right now poker online as in Replay Poker, they’ve updated some things since the elimination of Adobe Flash, is the best you can find online for competitive meaningless poker.If you want real action it’s not much different and personally I don’t know anyone that trusts online services enough to gamble money within a system that is easily controlled by unfederated access by way of point of protection systems and public mainframes.
In reality online gambling should be on a private intranet, maybe it is, but with money on the line there are other stakes like dropouts that occur that usually seem to favor the big winners when they are about to lose.I find it hard to believe there would be safety among all the dangers online to gamble with real money in high stakes poker online.That’s why having a game where you use it to meet other people and play games would be fun and interesting.Instead of using video services for chat where people always end up using it for pornography, why not establish a meaning behind what the service of video conferencing is meant for and kick everyone else out that isn’t using it for that purpose.Why does greed always lead all video services to allow for a blood bath of dark net users online,.
CRYPTOCURRENCY KICKED MY ASS
I had hoped to see the cryptocurrencies fall into more of a trench before the halving.
This did not happen and instead the halving has already ‘happening’d’.As far as I’m concerned the bitcoin boost I was looking for has already happened and if you think it’s going to drop all the down as it did before in the next two weeks than go all the way back up well then that’s something I already considered.Whether we like it or not crypto has taken it’s moves and moved quickly.Now that Bitcoin is already at over $9000 it’s easy to see the main growth is unavailable in the traditional sense of the movement I’ve seen thus far.As for people who are truly egocentric about cryptocurrency they of course dream about things that you cannot base on past performances of reality, as in $20k again? Not likely, not unless a whole lot of miners find hash all at the same exact time.
And the only way that’s possible is if one person started a whole lot of computers working on the same problem at the same time.
MIXMAG ARTICLE, MINIMUM VALUE OF STREAMS FROM MUSIC ONLINE FOR MONEY
Here’s is the link to the article that links to the guy who posted the minor info about money making through streaming platforms.
I added to that by throwing all the numbers together to put it into a quicker perspective for people, here.
one hour is 1615 plays = $10.96 one day (8 hours) is 12920 plays = $87.68 two weeks is 129200 plays = $876.80 one month is 258400 plays = $1753.60 one year is 3100800 plays = $21043.20
This numbering is based off of what @thetrichordist posted pertaining to the Apple Music number of plays.I used that as the middle of the road average for value from streams.
The article says the facts are terrifying but I disagree with that.Making money in any case is better than no money from music so rather than be ignorant and turn away the money it’s always better to make $21k extra a year on top of working a fast food job than to only make the money from slinging burgers for teenagers.
Those figures and facts are not too pleasing to see considering how difficult it is to garner a fanbase online.Looks like I won’t be quitting alternative forms of money making on the side of producing sounds and playing music.
This is like commentary only without anyone starting the conversation so even though I consider my intact ideas to comment on behaviors and rationalities in life the truth is I usually start an idea therefore the idea itself is not commentary because no one spawns the idea that leads me to think this way and instead I originate an idea in my head..